Anti-abortion advocates are pressing for expanded abortion bans and tighter restrictions since the Supreme Court overturned the national right to abortion. But with the debate mostly deadlocked in Washington, the focus is shifting to states convening their first full legislative sessions since Roe v. Wade was overturned.
Although some state GOP lawmakers have filed bills to ban abortion pills or make it more difficult for women to travel out of state for an abortion, others seem split about what their next steps should be. Some are even considering measures to ease their states鈥 existing bans somewhat, particularly after Republicans鈥 less-than-stellar showing in the 2022 midterm elections and voters鈥 widespread support for abortion on state ballot measures.
Meanwhile, Democratic-led states are looking to shore up abortion protections, including Minnesota and Michigan, where Democrats sewed up legislative majorities in the November elections.
Anti-abortion groups said their goal in overturning Roe v. Wade was to turn the decision back to the states, but now they are making clear that what they want is an encompassing national abortion ban.
鈥淟egislation at the state and federal levels should provide the most generous protections possible to life in the womb,鈥 says the 鈥溾 of the anti-abortion group Students for Life.
The new Republican-led House showed its anti-abortion bona fides on its first day of formal legislating, Jan. 11, passing that are unlikely to become law with a Senate still controlled by Democrats and President Joe Biden in the White House.
So at the federal level, the fight is taking shape in the courts over the abortion pill mifepristone, which has been used as part of a two-drug regimen for more than two decades, and recently became the way are conducted.
The Biden administration has moved to make mifepristone more widely available by allowing it to be , as well as clarifying that it is . But the conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, on behalf of several anti-abortion groups, in November, charging that the FDA never had the authority to approve the drug in the first place.
In Texas, some lawmakers are exploring new ways to chip away at Texans鈥 remaining sliver of access to abortions. For example, one proposal would prevent local governments from using tax dollars to help people access abortion services out of state, while another would prohibit tax subsidies for businesses that help their local employees obtain abortions out of state.
Those measures could get lost in the shuffle of the state鈥檚 frantic 140-day, every-other-year session, if legislative leaders don鈥檛 consider them a priority. The state鈥檚 trigger law banning almost all abortions that went into effect last year 鈥渁ppears to be working very well,鈥 said , founder and executive director of Texas Alliance for Life, an anti-abortion group. In August 2022, three abortions were documented in the state, down from more 5,700 reported during the same month a year earlier, according to the most recent .
The top state House Republican said his priority is boosting support for new moms, for example, by extending postpartum Medicaid coverage to 12 months.
It鈥檚 鈥渁n opportunity for the Texas House to focus more than ever on supporting mothers and children,鈥 said Republican House Speaker .
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican, struck a similar theme , saying she will introduce bills to for nurses to visit new mothers at home and help state employees pay for adoptions. South Dakota needs to focus 鈥渙n taking care of mothers in crisis and getting them the resources that they need for both them and their child to be successful.鈥
Some Texas GOP lawmakers indicated they may be open to to the abortion ban in cases of rape and incest. And a Republican lawmaker plans to attempt to modify South Dakota鈥檚 ban, which allows abortions only for life-threatening pregnancies, to clarify when abortions are medically necessary.
鈥淧art of the issue right now is that doctors and providers just don’t know what that line is,鈥 said state , a nurse who has experienced miscarriages and high-risk pregnancies herself.
Rehfeldt wants to reinstate that allows abortions for pregnancies that could cause serious, irreversible physical harm to a 鈥渕ajor bodily function.鈥 Rehfeldt said she is also working on bills to allow abortions for people carrying non-viable fetuses, or who became pregnant after rape or incest.
Some anti-abortion activists in Georgia are pushing lawmakers to go further than the state鈥檚 ban on most abortions at about six weeks of pregnancy. They want a law to ban telehealth prescriptions of abortion pills and a state constitutional amendment declaring that an embryo or a fetus has all the legal rights of a person at any stage of development.
鈥Roe is out of the way,鈥 said Zemmie Fleck, executive director of . 鈥淭here’s no more roadblock to what we can do in our state.鈥
Republican leaders, however, are biding their time while Georgia鈥檚 high court weighs a legal challenge of the six-week ban. 鈥淥ur focus remains on the case before the Georgia Supreme Court and seeing it across the finish line,鈥 said Andrew Isenhour, spokesperson for Republican Gov. Brian Kemp.
Abortion rights lawmakers and advocates have few options to advance their initiatives in these Republican-controlled statehouses.
A Georgia Democrat filed a bill that would make the state compensate women who are unable to terminate pregnancies because of the state鈥檚 abortion ban. State acknowledged her bill likely won鈥檛 go far, but she said she hopes it keeps attention on the issue and forces GOP lawmakers to 鈥減ut their money where their mouth is鈥 in supporting families.
In Missouri, where are now banned, abortion rights advocates are of circumventing the state鈥檚 Republican-dominated legislature by asking voters in 2024 to enshrine the right to an abortion in the state鈥檚 constitution.
But those efforts could be upended by a filed by Republican lawmakers seeking to make it more difficult to place constitutional initiatives on the ballot, and for those measures that do make it on the ballot, by requiring the approval of at least 60% of voters for passage.
Democrats in Michigan and Minnesota are likely to use their newfound control of both legislative chambers and the governors鈥 office to protect abortion access. While Michigan voters already passed a ballot measure in November that enshrines the right to abortions in the state constitution, Democrats are trying to .
In Illinois, Democrats in control of the legislature abortion protections . lawmakers this year may send voters a proposed state constitutional amendment to protect abortion, while decided against a similar proposal.
The November elections brought divided government to Arizona and Nevada, with Arizona now having a Democratic governor and Nevada having a Republican one. Any abortion-related bills that pass the legislatures in those states could be vetoed.
Some Republican-controlled legislatures, including those in Montana, Florida, and Alaska, also are limited in passing sweeping abortion bans because of court rulings that tie abortion access to right-to-privacy provisions in those states鈥 constitutions.
In Montana, a state judge blocked three anti-abortion laws passed in 2021 on that basis. State government attorneys have asked the Montana Supreme Court to reverse the precedent, and a decision is pending.
In the meantime, Republican state has there seeking to exclude abortion from the state鈥檚 definition of a right to privacy. he believes an individual鈥檚 right to privacy should not apply to abortion because an unborn child also is involved.
Democratic leaders said Republicans are out of sync with the people they represent on this issue. In November, Montana that would have required doctors to apply medical care to newborns who draw breath or have a heartbeat after a failed abortion or any other birth.
鈥淢ontanans said so clearly that they do not want government overreach in their health care decisions,鈥 said Democratic state .
KHN correspondents Renuka Rayasam and Sam Whitehead in Atlanta; Arielle Zionts in Rapid City, South Dakota; Bram Sable-Smith in St. Louis; and Katheryn Houghton in Missoula, Montana, contributed to this report.
