Nearly a year after Montana began receiving millions of dollars to invest in efforts to combat the opioid crisis, much of that money remains untouched. Meanwhile, the state鈥檚 opioid overdose and death counts continue to rise.
The money is part of the approximately $50 billion that states and local governments will over nearly two decades. The payments come from that made, distributed, or sold prescription opioid painkillers that were sued for their role in fueling the overdose epidemic.
Many places have begun deciding where that money will go and making payments to schools, public health departments, and local governments. South Carolina, for example, more than $7 million to 21 grantees. Wisconsin two years鈥 worth of spending plans that total nearly $40 million.
Montana, West Virginia, and Hawaii are among the states moving slower.
Montana began receiving its first settlement payments in January, and, by fall, payments totaled roughly $13 million. As of early December, the 鈥 a private nonprofit created to oversee 70% of the state鈥檚 share 鈥 had met once to agree to its rules of operation, and its money remained locked behind an inactive grant portal. The remainder, divided among the state and local governments, either hadn鈥檛 been spent or wasn鈥檛 publicly recorded.
Those charged with distributing the money say they鈥檙e building a framework to spend it in ways that last. Meanwhile, some addiction treatment providers are eager to use the funds to plug gaps in services.
The tension in Montana reflects a nationwide push-pull. Those handling settlement dollars say governments should take their time planning how to use the enormous windfall. Others argue for urgency as the drug supply has become . Americans died of overdoses in 2022, surpassing the previous year鈥檚 record-setting death toll.
Nearly 200 Montanans died of a drug overdose in 2021, the latest year . That number, likely an undercount, is roughly 40 more deaths than the year before. Emergency medical responders have continued to record an increasing number of this year.
In Billings, the Rimrock Foundation, one of the state鈥檚 largest behavioral health providers, has seen its number of clients with opioid use dependency more than triple since 2021. Like other treatment facilities, Rimrock has a waitlist, and addiction treatment providers worry about the limited community resources that exist for patients once they are discharged. 鈥淭he result of not addressing this is a lot of deaths,鈥 said Jennifer Verhasselt, Rimrock Foundation鈥檚 chief clinical officer.
Debbie Knutson, Rimrock鈥檚 medical unit and nursing supervisor, said there is widespread confusion about how and when the state鈥檚 settlement dollars can be used.
鈥淚t鈥檚 very concerning if we have money available that we could use to help people that is just kind of sitting, waiting for somebody to decide where it should go,鈥 Knutson said.
Rusty Gackle, the Montana Opioid Abatement Trust executive director, said a lot of work has happened behind the scenes to get local governments ready to accept their initial payments and for regional leaders to form systems to request money from the trust. That included hosting a series of town hall-style meetings to share information about the process. He said many of those local regions are still finalizing their governance structures.
鈥淚 would love to progress a little bit faster,鈥 Gackle said. 鈥淏ut I鈥檇 rather do it right so that we鈥檙e not having to go backwards.鈥
Montana officials got a late start too, he added. Some states began receiving settlement dollars last year, but Montana was toward the tail end of the line.
Montana is dividing its money three ways: 15% to the state, 15% to local governments, and the rest to the Montana Opioid Abatement Trust, with some money set aside for attorneys鈥 fees.
As of late November, the state hadn鈥檛 begun spending the $2.4 million it had in hand for state agencies. Officials also aren鈥檛 tracking how and when local governments spend their direct payments.
Similarly, West Virginia and hadn鈥檛 鈥 by late November 鈥 begun spending the largest shares of their funding. In West Virginia, the makeup of the foundation board that will oversee roughly 70% of the state鈥檚 settlement dollars was announced only in August, six weeks , and the board is now sitting on .
Nationwide, state and local governments have received more than as of Nov. 9. How much of that has been used remains uncertain due to states鈥 lack of public reporting. But from what is known, it varies.
Colorado, whose spending plan is similar to Montana鈥檚 but received its settlement money earlier, toward school and community-based programs, recovery housing services, and expanded treatment services.
, a Johns Hopkins researcher who tracks states’ uses of opioid settlement funds, said a slower start isn鈥檛 inherently wrong. She prefers governments take time to spend the money well rather than fund outdated or untested practices. In some cases, governments are building entirely new systems to dole out the money. Several waited until the courts finalized the settlement amounts and details.
鈥淭here are definitely states that were like, 鈥榃e are going to get money at some point. We don’t know how much or when, but let’s start setting up our system,鈥欌 Whaley said. 鈥淥ther folks were like, ‘We have a lot going on already. We’ll just wait until we get it and then we’ll know what the settlement terms are.鈥欌
Even once committees start meeting, it can take months for the money to reach front-line organizations.
Connecticut鈥檚 opioid settlement advisory committee in November, eight months after it was formed. Maine鈥檚 recovery council, which controls half the state鈥檚 settlement funds, has been November 2022, but just recently for the it has on hand and still needs to establish a grant application process.
Tennessee鈥檚 Opioid Abatement Council accepted grant applications this fall. Stephen Loyd, council chair, said the process 鈥 from picking awardees to processing payments 鈥 will take roughly six months. Within that time, he said, 2,808 Tennesseans are likely to die of drug overdoses.
As an interim step, Loyd proposed at an October meeting to award $7.5 million to an emergency six-month initiative to flood the state with naloxone, a medication that reverses opioid overdoses.
But his proposal was met with protests from council members, who pushed back on what they saw as a circumvention of the grant process they had spent months establishing. The council didn鈥檛 vote on the emergency initiative but instead created an expedited review process to consider fast-tracking future applications.
Gackle said he doesn鈥檛 think Montana is far behind others. Now that spending systems are almost in place, he said, things should move faster.
Lewis and Clark County, home to the state capital, Helena, has a yearlong plan and budget for opioid settlement funds. A cohort of 17 counties in rural eastern Montana defined its regional settlement decision-makers in November and, by early December, had yet to begin official talks about where the money should go.
Brenda Kneeland, CEO of Eastern Montana Community Mental Health Center and an advisory committee member for the Montana Opioid Abatement Trust, said eastern Montana has one inpatient treatment center for substance use disorders and zero detox facilities, so emergency rooms end up serving as a fallback resource.
Kneeland said local officials want to ensure they understand the rules to avoid trouble later and to stretch the funding.
鈥淵ou don’t get an opportunity to try to correct such a wrong very often,鈥 Kneeland said. 鈥淚t’s just a huge job at a county level. I’ve never seen an undertaking like this in my career.鈥
The Montana Opioid Abatement Trust advisory committee will meet quarterly, meaning its next chance to review any submitted grants will be next spring.
